Posted By: reillylivesFor me, this is no different than popping in a concert DVD. Only a lot more expensive.
I saw ABBA live in 1979. It was a great show. No interest in simulated ABBA.
Posted By: CliffFINmark2One day AC/DC will tour in a similar kinda format
Posted By: reillylivesFor me, this is no different than popping in a concert DVD. Only a lot more expensive.
I saw ABBA live in 1979. It was a great show. No interest in simulated ABBA.
Posted By: CWT1965Holograms are a terrible idea, just an excuse to make money, if AC/DC did a gig with hologram Bon I would rather drink bleach or pull my teeth out with pliers than attend such a freakshow and Bon was my idol growing up
Posted By: nimetaPosted By: CWT1965Holograms are a terrible idea, just an excuse to make money, if AC/DC did a gig with hologram Bon I would rather drink bleach or pull my teeth out with pliers than attend such a freakshow and Bon was my idol growing up
I am kinda with you on this, but in life I always try to see the alternate POV.
Which, in this case, maybe runs along the lines of...well you go to the cinema and pay $10 or so to see a famous actor perform. This isn't the same exactly, but how different is it? ABBA took it to an extreme, building a bespoke stadium...investing over $100m as I understand it...so for that its gonna be more expensive of course. But lets say they re-release the LTBR movie with unforeseen footage and it was in theatres, would we watch that? Then say it was in 3D, would we object to that? Where do the boundaries lie?
Posted By: CWT1965Holograms are a terrible idea, just an excuse to make money, if AC/DC did a gig with hologram Bon I would rather drink bleach or pull my teeth out with pliers than attend such a freakshow and Bon was my idol growing up
1 to 23 of 23