Posted By: ToiletWallPoetPosted By: azel"On whose behalf are you offended by it would be my question".
Exactly this. Too many people in these times being offended on other people's behalf.
There are still plenty of people with physical disfigurement alive today. It's not really just about Merrick himself. If, for the sake of argument, the album cover was mocking disfigured people, would you not find that immoral?
Posted By: carlos fandangoIt’s not though is it? It’s clearly John Merrick
As the father of a son with clear physical and learning disabilities (Downs Syndrome) this is an area I’m pretty sensitive about and if I thought this particular piece of art was mocking people with disabilities generally I’d be over this like stink on shit. In an age when there is increased sensitivity about race, religion and gender issues people with disabilities are not given the same consideration. For example people still seem to be able use words like retard, libtard, fucktard with impunity. I find these words incredibly offensive and find them as disgusting as people do the “N” word (and rightly so). But it still happens without apparent censure
Posted By: RichraffHopefully we'll never see the giant blow-up Rosie again at a DC gig. I simply wouldn't be able to enjoy the live music due to worrying about the offense it could be causing all the fatty-fat-fats at the concert.